A little wind noise, a little connectivity flakiness, and a little lip-sync issues from YouTube, but look at that view! 🤩 Back to business, it's the Brinks Home FAQ I found most interesting this week. I mean, how do you write your own FAQ then fail to actually answer most of the questions?! Being conscious that they're the target of criminal extortion and are genuinely the victims here, I still struggle to grasp how simple incident response questions can be so lawyer-speaked as to remove all sensible meaning from the responses. But this is how these things tend to play out these days (speaking generically, yet to be seen fully for Brinks): hacker gets data by just calling up and asking for it (vishing -> OAuth), hacker demands money, hacker gets no money so dumps the data, company gets a gazillion class actions overnight and lawyers up to the hilt, customers get notified "where legally required" (which it usually isn't) 🤷♂️
Weekly update- Homepage
- International
- Weekly Update 516: Live From Vietnam
Related
When the Student Doesn’t Exist
2 hours ago
6
CISA Announces Enhanced Reporting Form for Cyber Incidents
9 hours ago
11
Microsoft Fixes RCE Bug in Windows Paint After Weeks of Conf...
10 hours ago
12
Black Hat India 2026 Makes a Landmark Debut in Bengaluru, Br...
11 hours ago
13
Attackers Crash Claude's 'Office Party' Flaw to Run Maliciou...
13 hours ago
12
PwC's CISO on AI, Robots & What's Next for Security
14 hours ago
12
NIST: Solo Shouldn't Mean Less Secure
15 hours ago
11
UK Wades Into Tech Sovereignty Amid AI Policy Changes
3 days ago
44
AI Gave Your Incident Archive a Second Job
3 days ago
42









